Peer Review Process
The Journal of Medical and Applied Translational Health Sciences is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics and integrity. Our review process is designed to ensure the quality and validity of the research articles we publish.
We adhere to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and follow a double-blind peer review process, where both the authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other. This process helps to maintain the objectivity and impartiality of the review process.
Our review process involves the following steps:
- Initial Screening: The editorial team reviews the submitted manuscript to ensure it meets the journal's scope and standards.
- Peer Review: The manuscript is sent to at least two independent reviewers who are experts in the field. The reviewers provide a thorough evaluation of the manuscript, including its originality, methodology, and conclusions.
- Revision and Resubmission: Based on the reviewers' comments, the authors are required to revise and resubmit their manuscript. The revised manuscript is then re-reviewed by the editorial team and/or the original reviewers.
- Final Decision: The editorial team makes a final decision on the manuscript, which can be acceptance, rejection, or further revision.
All articles published in the Journal of Medical and Applied Translational Health Sciences are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY), which allows for the free use, sharing, and adaptation of the articles in any medium or format, as long as the original authors and source are credited.
We believe that transparency and accountability are essential in the publication process. Therefore, we require authors to disclose any potential conflicts of interest, and we ensure that our review process is fair, unbiased, and transparent.